Wade in China中国制躁
Essay · Editorial Board
Read 12 min · Episode 5

What the Flame Could Not Burn

Audio edition 有声版
0:00 / 17:01MP3 ↓

Ancient poetry hidden under floorboards, hand-copied novels read by kerosene lamps, and flatbed pedicab drivers pedaling into gunfire. Why human decency survived the totalitarian machine.

1I. The Ash on the Pavement

n late August 1966, the streets of Beijing and Shanghai smelled of charred paper.

very few blocks, bonfires burned on the asphalt. Around each fire stood teenage boys and girls wearing red armbands, military belts with heavy brass buckles, and khaki uniforms. They were the Red Guards, carrying out the destruction of the Four Olds: old customs, old culture, old habits, and old ideas.

Into the flames went centuries of human labor and intellectual refinement: Ming dynasty woodblock editions of classical poetry, family genealogies traced through thirty generations, Western oil paintings slashed from their gilt frames, classical phonograph records smashed with hammers, and silk gowns tailored in pre-war Suzhou. From apartment balconies, piles of books rained down into the courtyards: translations of Shakespeare, Balzac, and Tolstoy, treatises on Buddhist logic, and calligraphy albums written by Qing Dynasty scholars. Black soot drifted through the summer air, settling on windowsills, telephone wires, and the leaves of plane trees.

The violence was not an undisciplined riot. It was a state-sponsored exorcism.

The regime understood that to forge a thoroughly obedient New Socialist Man, it had to eradicate everything that predated the revolution. An ancient genealogy reminded a family that they belonged to an unbroken lineage that existed long before the party. A volume of classical poetry reminded a reader that sorrow, romantic longing, and individual solitude were universal human emotions, completely independent of the class struggle.

By burning the artifacts of the past, the Red Guards believed they were clearing the ground for a pristine socialist paradise. They believed that once the paper turned to gray ash, the ideas written on the paper would vanish forever from human memory.

They were wrong.

2II. The Books in the Floorboards

While the bonfires raged in the streets, a quiet, desperate conspiracy of preservation was unfolding behind locked doors.

In an alleyway off Fuxingmen in Beijing, an elderly high school literature teacher waited until midnight. When the street grew quiet, he pulled back the carpet in his bedroom, pried up three loose floorboards, and gently lowered two bundles wrapped in oilcloth into the dark cavity between the joists. Inside were his grandfather's Song-dynasty editions of the *Book of Songs* and his own hand-copied notebooks of Tang poetry. He replaced the boards, nailed them flush, sprinkled dust over the seams, and placed a wooden chest over the spot. He knew that if the Red Guards searched his home the following morning, the discovery of those books would mean a public beating with brass belt buckles and a one-way ticket to a labor camp. He hid them anyway.

In Shanghai, families took ancient celadon bowls and painted them over with thick layers of black shoe polish or mud, making them look like worthless clay pots. In Suzhou, craftsmen dismantled delicate zithers, concealed the strings inside mattress padding, and hid the wooden soundboards behind false brick walls.

At the Dunhuang Mogao Caves in the deserts of Gansu, the local staff, led by the scholar Chang Shuhong, heard that a convoy of Red Guards from Lanzhou was arriving to smash the ancient Buddhist murals and sculptures. The staff spent forty-eight hours sealing the entrances to the most precious caves with timber, piling sand dunes against the wooden doors, and posting large portraits of Chairman Mao directly over the cave openings, knowing that the Red Guards would not dare smash a wall bearing the likeness of the Great Leader.

Why did people risk their lives, their livelihoods, and the safety of their children to protect a stack of paper or an ancient bowl?

Because they understood, instinctively, that a human being stripped of memory is no longer a human being. They knew that political madness is loud, furious, and temporary, while the quiet elegance of human thought is durable. By preserving those artifacts in the dark, they were keeping a pilot light burning beneath the snow.

3III. The Yellow Covers in the Lamplight

The fury of Red August eventually burned itself out, replaced by the grim, frozen monotony of the late Cultural Revolution. By 1970, seventeen million urban youth had been sent down to the countryside to be "re-educated" by poor peasants.

In the mud-brick dormitories of northern Shaanxi, in the mosquito-infested rubber plantations of Yunnan, and in the frozen barracks of the Great Northern Wilderness, an extraordinary subterranean cultural movement was born: the samizdat network of the "Yellow Cover Books" (黄皮书).

In the early 1960s, the state had secretly published small, numbered editions of contemporary Western literature and philosophy, bound in plain yellow or gray paper covers. They were officially intended only for internal reference by senior officials, so that the leadership could "study the ideological decay of the bourgeois West." Among the translated titles were J.D. Salinger's *The Catcher in the Rye*, Albert Camus's *The Stranger*, William Shirer's *The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich*, and poetry by Federico Garcia Lorca.

Inevitably, copies leaked from the private libraries of cadres' children into the hands of sent-down youth.

A single battered volume of *The Catcher in the Rye* would travel through twenty villages in a single month. Young men and women sat beneath kerosene lamps late into the night, copying entire novels by hand into brown paper notebooks. When a notebook was filled, it was traded for another hand-copied text: a translation of Baudelaire, an underground novel by an unknown student, or a cycle of lyric poems written by a classmate in another county.

Consider the surreal beauty of that moment. By day, these teenagers stood knee-deep in freezing mud, reciting quotations from Chairman Mao's Little Red Book and carrying hundred-pound sacks of grain. By night, huddled around a flickering wick, their fingers blackened with ink, they were reading existentialist literature and discovering that across the world, other human beings had felt lonely, alienated, and hungry for truth.

The state had stripped them of their schools, their families, and their futures. It had forced them to wear identical blue jackets and chant identical slogans. But in the dim circle of lamplight, behind the cover of a hand-copied notebook, they preserved their interior lives. The flame had burned their libraries, but it had completely failed to burn their thirst to understand the world.

4IV. The Wall That Reclaimed Words

When Mao Zedong died in September 1976 and the Gang of Four was arrested a month later, the ice began to crack. But the cultural awakening that followed did not originate from official government decrees. It erupted from the pavement.

In the winter of 1978, on a long brick wall along Xidan Street in central Beijing, ordinary citizens began pasting handwritten posters.

It was called the Democracy Wall. At first, the posters dealt with personal grievances: demands for the rehabilitation of relatives killed during the Cultural Revolution, complaints about rusticated youth unable to return to the cities, and appeals against corrupt cadres.

Then came the literature.

A young worker named Bei Dao, alongside the poet Mang Ke, pasted the first issue of an independent, mimeographed literary magazine called *Today* (今天) onto the brick wall. It was the first unofficial, uncensored publication to appear in the People's Republic of China since 1949.

Among the poems posted on the wall was Bei Dao's *The Answer* (回答). It contained a stanza that instantly became the anthem of an entire generation:

I do not believe the sky is blue; I do not believe in the thunder's echoes; I do not believe that dreams are false; I do not believe that death has no retribution. If a thousand challengers lie beneath your feet, Count me as the one thousand and first.

For thirty years, Chinese literature had been reduced to wooden propaganda formulas: heroic workers, villainous class enemies, and radiant party secretaries smiling into the socialist dawn. Bei Dao's poetry shattered that artificial landscape in a single stroke.

At the same time, writers like Liu Xinwu published *The Class Teacher* and Lu Xinhua published *The Scar*, inaugurating the movement known as Scar Literature (伤痕文学). For the first time, state-approved journals were forced to acknowledge what everyone already knew: that the previous decade had not been a glorious revolutionary festival, but a traumatic bloodbath that had shattered millions of ordinary lives.

The Democracy Wall was eventually shut down in the spring of 1979, and independent voices like Wei Jingsheng were arrested and sentenced to long prison terms. But the words had already escaped into the air. Once human beings discover that they have a right to their own grief, their own beauty, and their own doubts, the monopoly on language is permanently broken.

5V. The Pedicabs in the Line of Fire

The ultimate test of what is worth keeping came a decade later, in the spring of 1989.

The Western memory of Tiananmen Square is dominated by the monumental symbols: the student hunger strikers in white headbands, the thirty-foot statue of the Goddess of Democracy, and the solitary figure of Tank Man standing before a column of Type 59 tanks on Chang'an Avenue.

All of those images are heroic. But the deepest moral truth of 1989 was revealed not on the square itself, but in the darkened alleyways of Beijing on the night of June 3 and the morning of June 4.

When military units opened fire on unarmed crowds along West Chang'an Avenue, the victims were not merely university activists. They were ordinary Beijing workers, factory apprentices, electricians, and retired grandmothers who had come out into the streets to protect the students.

In that slaughter, an ancient, humble vehicle became the supreme instrument of human mercy: the Beijing flatbed pedicab (平板三轮).

The pedicab drivers were among the poorest laborers in the capital. They were men who hauled coal briquettes, watermelons, and building materials through the narrow hutongs for pennies a day. They had no university degrees and no grand theories of constitutional law.

Yet when the firing began at Muxidi and Gongzhufen, while tracer bullets cut through the night and tear gas filled the streets, dozens of pedicab drivers did not flee. They turned their three-wheeled carts around and pedaled directly toward the gunfire.

Photographs taken by foreign journalists that night show the same agonizing scene repeated dozens of times: a middle-aged laborer, his face contorted in exertion and terror, pedaling furiously toward the Beijing Union Hospital, while on the wooden slats behind him lay a young student or a worker, blood soaking through their shirts, held in the arms of a sobbing stranger.

In the residential compounds near Xidan, ordinary families unlocked their courtyard gates in the middle of the night, pulled fleeing, terrified teenagers off the streets, and hid them in coal sheds and bicycle racks while soldiers with automatic rifles searched the hutongs.

Those pedicab drivers and elderly neighbors were not performing for television cameras. They had no hope of reward, and every expectation of punishment. They acted out of an irreducible, instinctual refusal to let innocent human beings be slaughtered like dogs. In the absolute darkest hour of the Chinese twentieth century, the ordinary people of Beijing proved that beneath seventy years of ideological indoctrination, the fundamental capacity for human decency was completely intact.

6VI. The Decency That Power Cannot Confiscate

Why does totalitarian rule hate genuine culture, authentic literature, and simple human decency?

Because culture and decency are inherently uncontrollable.

You can nationalize a steel mill. You can confiscate a farm. You can draft an army and you can force three thousand delegates to press a green voting button on command. But you cannot nationalize the feeling a mother experiences when she looks at her newborn child. You cannot nationalize the quiet dignity with which a scholar sits in a labor camp, refusing to write a false confession against his friend. You cannot nationalize the courage of a laborer who pedals his cart toward rifle fire to pull a bleeding stranger from the asphalt.

Totalitarian power desires total dominion over the human soul. It demands that the party be your father, your mother, your conscience, and your god. It wants you to love only what it commands you to love, and to hate whatever enemy it nominates for destruction this morning.

Against this terrifying totalization, the preservation of an ordinary life becomes an act of profound resistance.

When Shen Congwen, one of China's greatest twentieth-century novelists, was silenced by the new regime in 1949 and forbidden to write fiction, he did not commit suicide, and he did not write sycophantic hymns to Chairman Mao. Instead, he quietly transferred to the Palace Museum in Beijing, spent the next thirty years examining ancient silk fragments, embroideries, and bronze belt hooks, and produced the monumental *Studies on Ancient Chinese Clothing and Adornment*. While the nation was screaming slogans and burning books, Shen Congwen was quietly cataloging the stitches and colors with which ordinary Chinese artisans had dressed themselves over two thousand years.

He understood that regimes rise, murder, decay, and collapse, but the beauty of human craftsmanship belongs to eternity.

7VII. What Is Worth Keeping

This brings us to the fifth topic of our series: What Endures (传承).

When people study modern Chinese history, they are often overwhelmed by the sheer scale of the horror: the land reform quotas, the Great Famine, the Red August murders, the labor camps of Jiabiangou, and the tanks on Chang'an Avenue. It is easy to conclude that this history is merely a chronicle of cruelty, a barren desert where power crushed everything in its path.

That conclusion is incomplete, and it is unjust to the dead.

What makes this history profoundly moving is not the machinery of oppression. Machinery is dumb, crude, and repetitive. What makes this history worth studying is what survived the machinery.

What survived was the grandfather's poetry collection buried beneath the floorboards. What survived was the hand-copied notebook read by the flickering kerosene lamp in Shaanxi. What survived was the line of poetry pasted on the Xidan Wall: *Count me as the one thousand and first.* What survived was the pedicab driver pedaling into the gunfire. What survived was the courage of the Tiananmen Mothers, who spent thirty-five years documenting the names of their murdered children, refusing to let the state erase their existence.

A civilization is not measured by the length of its high-speed rail network, the tonnage of its aircraft carriers, or the towering skyscrapers of its coastal cities. An empire can possess all of those things and remain a spiritual wasteland.

A civilization is measured by the quality of its human conscience. It is measured by whether an ordinary person, standing in the middle of a screaming crowd, still has the dignity to refuse a lie, the courage to protect a book, and the compassion to open their door to a stranger in the dark.

These are the Good Things. They are the only things that the flame could not burn, and they are the only things worth keeping.

On the timeline

Events this essay rests on